Spikey00 Community Forums
Welcome to our community forums!

Our forums are for anyone who would like to share some thoughts and ideas, posting about gaming or life or anything else for all to view and reply. Currently it's a small (but faithful) community, and we encourage visitors to join us, such as yourself, if you find something you like about us.

Feel free to look around, but don't hesitate to register! This is a casual forum, and another member is always appreciated!

All the best!
Josh "Spikey00" Y.

Join the forum, it's quick and easy

Spikey00 Community Forums
Welcome to our community forums!

Our forums are for anyone who would like to share some thoughts and ideas, posting about gaming or life or anything else for all to view and reply. Currently it's a small (but faithful) community, and we encourage visitors to join us, such as yourself, if you find something you like about us.

Feel free to look around, but don't hesitate to register! This is a casual forum, and another member is always appreciated!

All the best!
Josh "Spikey00" Y.
Spikey00 Community Forums
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Jon Stewart puts 'net neutrality commandments' in plain English

Go down

Jon Stewart puts 'net neutrality commandments' in plain English Empty Jon Stewart puts 'net neutrality commandments' in plain English

Post by Josh "Spikey00" Y. Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:22 pm


Jon Stewart puts 'net neutrality commandments' in plain English Jon-Stewart-Internet-Predator-thumb-550xauto-45211


Funnyman Jon Stewart has shown on more than one occasion that he can
tackle the more serious issues with a dash of humor and come out making a
fresh point. He's doing that now with Google and Verizon's proposal to define net neutrality.













Jon Stewart makes two big points here, one we agree with and one that
we don't. The first covers the big fear: that Google, Verizon and
similar companies could make deals that would make certain websites run
faster than others, giving priority to the outfits that pay up. As
Stewart points out, this is mainly a worry over the wireless side of
things.

We don't see this happening. (We hope this doesn't happen.) As
it's designed, Google's language indicates that less regulations are
put on wireless as it's a growing space, and fair play will have to be
determined on the fly. Of course, the system is only as good as the
companies make it, so we'll see.

The point we do agree with is one Stewart makes in reaction to this
idea of some sites getting a privileged spot: "What about porn?" That
is, the sad truth here is that if that's the way it's going to be —
companies shelling out cash for speed — you have to wonder how many
people will actually care enough.

Right now, we're all hoping that the FCC can stand its ground, and that Google really is looking to continue to "do no evil."

Check out the clip in OP.


Josh
Josh "Spikey00" Y.
Administrator
Administrator

Posts : 1217
Join date : 2010-07-25
Age : 31
Location : Canada, Alberta

http://spikey00.omgforum.net

Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum